Find the land
Plain-English parcel search across every ingested county: owner, acreage, zoning, flood, and terrain in one card.
A traditional feasibility study runs $15K–$50K and takes 8–12 weeks. LotQuick answers the two questions that decide a land deal, what can I build here and does it pencil, straight from the parcel record, in about a minute.
Two questions decide every land deal: what can I build here, and does it pencil. Everything on the platform feeds those two answers.
Plain-English parcel search across every ingested county: owner, acreage, zoning, flood, and terrain in one card.
Setbacks, density, height and coverage hand-encoded from the ordinance, cited to the section and dated.
AI site plans checked against those standards, benchmarked against 2,158 recorded plats.
CSI-coded cost estimates calibrated on public bid tabs, not vendor guesses.
Acquisition proformas from lot count to finished-lot cost, lot cost as a share of ASP, and residual land value.
A feasibility brief you can hand to land committee, with a licensed engineer's review before you build.
Load your plan inventory once: names, minimum lot dimensions, base costs. Every site plan then answers in your own product.
24 × Sage 1800
18 × Mesa 2200
6 × Summit 2600
48 homes on one parcel, each lot checked against the plan's minimum dimensions and the district's setbacks. Not a unit count: a buildable mix in your own inventory.
A density number tells you what the code allows. A product fit tells you what your division can actually build and sell. The Product Library keeps your plans, and every generated site plan reports yield in those plans, ready for land committee.
APN, address, or owner. The full county roll answers with zoning, flood and terrain attached.
Generate a compliant site plan, cost it line by line, and pencil the proforma. Each step feeds the next.
One document with every number traced to its source, ready for land committee.
Every zoning figure links to the ordinance section it came from and carries the date it was checked.
The layout engine is scored against 2,158 recorded plats: what jurisdictions actually approved, not what looks right.
10 years at homebuilder land desks across Phoenix metro, Utah, and Las Vegas. The workflow is the one land teams already run, encoded.
$500 a month, everything included. 14-day free trial, cancel in the portal.
Clark County, Nevada is live, county-wide: every parcel in the roll. Arizona & Utah on the roadmap.
Those tell you who owns the dirt. LotQuick tells you what the dirt can become: lot yield under the actual zoning, a compliant concept plan, CSI-coded costs, and an acquisition proforma — with every number citing its source. It's built to sit alongside your parcel-data tools, not to replace them.
Yes — this is the feature built for homebuilders. Load your product library once (plan name, min lot width and depth, base cost) and the site-plan engine assigns your products to every lot it draws: “24 × Sage 1800, 18 × Mesa 2200, 6 × Summit 2600 = 48 homes.” Yield in your product line, not generic boxes.
Then the card shows you where the number came from so you can catch it — assessor roll with its vintage, FEMA NFHL with the panel number, zoning cited to the ordinance section with the date we checked it. Where we can't verify, the platform says “not verified” instead of guessing. Send us a discrepancy and we fix it against the ordinance, not our opinion.
No — it replaces the 8–12 weeks wait before your civil engineer. LotQuick is screening-grade: it tells you which deals deserve the $15K–$50K study, and gives your engineer a head start when you commission it. Everything generated is REFERENCE ONLY until a licensed PE reviews and stamps it.
Every generated plan is checked against the encoded development standards for its district, and the layout engine is benchmarked against 2,158 recorded Clark County plats — what jurisdictions actually approved, not what looks right on screen. They're screening tools: good enough to size a deal, labelled honestly as not construction documents.
Yes. The zoning scenario switcher shows every district the parcel could plausibly carry, with yield, height and density deltas side by side, and it flags the one that matches what recorded subdivisions nearby actually built, naming how many it read and what they averaged. That is how you spot a neighbourhood already built denser than its code suggests, before you go under contract.
A feasibility brief: parcel record, zoning with citations, the site plan with lot yield by product, CSI line-item costs, and the proforma — every figure traced to its source, exportable to PDF and Excel. It's built to survive the person in the room whose job is to shred it.
Development standards are hand-encoded from each jurisdiction's published ordinance across 239 districts, cited to the code section with the date they were checked. Where zoning can't be verified for a parcel, the platform says exactly that rather than guessing.
Up to 3 seats on the one plan at $500/month, with no per-seat pricing inside that.
The 14-day free trial requires a card; when it ends, the subscription starts at $500/month. Cancel any time in the billing portal, effective at period end. The first paid month carries a 30-day money-back guarantee.